Analisis Faktor Preferensi Kerja Mahasiswa Tingkat Akhir Generasi Z Kota Bandung Berdasarkan Work Preference Indicator (WPI) dengan Pendekatan Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsbm.v6i2.26295Keywords:
Preferensi kerja, Generasi Z, Mahasiswa Tingkat Akhir, Work Preference Indicator (WPI), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Human Resource Planning (HRP), Person–Organization Fit (PO Fit)Abstract
Abstract. The increasing dominance of Generation Z in the workforce has encouraged organizations to understand the characteristics of prospective employees before they enter the labor market. From the perspective of Human Resource Planning (HRP), understanding individual characteristics is essential to support recruitment and selection processes. This study aims to examine the work preference factor structure of final-year Generation Z students in Bandung based on the Work Preference Indicator (WPI). This study employed a quantitative approach using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The sample consisted of 380 final-year Generation Z students in Bandung selected through purposive sampling. The research instrument was adapted from the Work Preference Indicator (WPI), comprising 75 statement items. Data were analyzed using SmartPLS 4. The results showed that all work preference factors were categorized as appropriate, with Flexibility obtaining the highest mean score. CFA confirmed that work preferences consisted of four dimensions—Learning Styles, Work Values, Work Interests, and Personality Temperament—comprising 17 work preference factors. After measurement model modification, 19 indicators met the criteria for factor loading, convergent validity, construct reliability, and discriminant validity. The findings support the relevance of Human Resource Planning (HRP) and Person–Organization Fit (P–O Fit) in explaining the work preferences of final-year Generation Z students.
Abstrak. Perkembangan Generasi Z sebagai kelompok yang mulai mendominasi angkatan kerja mendorong organisasi untuk memahami karakteristik calon tenaga kerja sebelum memasuki dunia kerja. Dalam perspektif Human Resource Planning (HRP), informasi mengenai karakteristik individu diperlukan untuk mendukung proses recruitment dan selection. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana struktur faktor preferensi kerja mahasiswa tingkat akhir Generasi Z di Kota Bandung berdasarkan instrumen Work Preference Indicator (WPI). Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Sampel penelitian terdiri atas 380 mahasiswa tingkat akhir Generasi Z di Kota Bandung yang dipilih menggunakan purposive sampling. Instrumen penelitian diadaptasi dari Work Preference Indicator (WPI) yang terdiri atas 75 indikator, analisis data dilakukan menggunakan SmartPLS 4. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa seluruh faktor preferensi kerja berada pada kategori sesuai, dengan faktor Flexibility memperoleh nilai rata-rata tertinggi. Analisis CFA mengonfirmasi bahwa preferensi kerja mahasiswa tingkat akhir Generasi Z terdiri atas empat dimensi, yaitu Learning Styles, Work Values, Work Interests, dan Personality Temperament, yang mencakup 17 faktor preferensi kerja. Setelah modifikasi model, diperoleh 19 indikator yang memenuhi kriteria factor loading, validitas konvergen, reliabilitas konstruk, dan validitas diskriminan. Temuan ini mendukung relevansi Human Resource Planning (HRP) dan Person–Organization Fit (P–O Fit) dalam menjelaskan preferensi kerja mahasiswa tingkat akhir Generasi Z.
References
BPS Kota Bandung. (2025). Kota Bandung dalam Angka 2025. https://bandungkota.bps.go.id
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person–Organization Fit, Job Choice Decisions, and Organizational Entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0081
Chillakuri, B. (2020). Understanding Generation Z expectations for effective onboarding. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), 1277–1296. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2020-0058
Cresswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Deloitte. (2025). Deloitte Global Gen Z and Millennial Survey 2025. In Deloitte. https://www.deloitte.com/gr/en/issues/work/genz-millennial-survey-2025.html
Gilbert, G. R., Sohi, R. S., & McEachern, A. G. (2008). Measuring Work Preferences. Career Development International, 13(1), 56–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810849542
Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2022). Multivariate Data Analysis. In Multivariate Data Analysis. Cengage Learning. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Multivariate_Data_Analysis.html?hl=id&id=PONXEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
IDN Research Institute. (2024). Indonesia Gen Z Report 2024. IDN Times. https://www.idntimes.com
Jackson, D., & Tomlinson, M. (2020). Investigating the relationship between career planning, proactivity and employability perceptions among higher education students in uncertain labour market conditions. Higher Education, 80(3), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00490-5
Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi, S. dan T. (2025). Pangkalan Data Pendidikan Tinggi. https://pddikti.kemdiktisaintek.go.id
Kementerian PPN/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. (2024). Laporan Perkembangan Ekonomi Kreatif Indonesia 2024. https://www.bappenas.go.id
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Fourth Edition. In The Guilford Press (Vol. 8, Number 5).
Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person–organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x
Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
McKinsey & Company. (2023). The State of Organizations. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.comhttps://www.mckinsey.com
Pallant, Julie. (2020). SPSS survival manual : a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge. https://books.google.com/books/about/SPSS_Survival_Manual.html?hl=id&id=bLG1zQEACAAJ
Quinlan, K. M., & Corbin, J. (2023). How and why do students’ career interests change during higher education? Studies in Higher Education, 48(6), 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2166916
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
