Legal Consequences of Netflix's Premium Sharing Ijarah Contract: A Review of Copyright Law and the Concept of Haqq Al-Ibtikar in Fiqh Muamalah on the @xxx Instagram Account
Keywords:
Ijarah, Premium Sharing, Copyright, Haqq al-ibtikaar, @xxxAbstract
Abstract. The business practice of renting access to premium accounts streaming on social media, as carried out by Instagram accounts, @xxx is rampant on social media. In practice, this premium access offers a much cheaper rental price below the official price of the platform through an account sharing scheme. This study aims to analyze the legal consequences of Netflix premium sharing access rental transactions reviewed from Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and the concept of haqq al-ibtikaar in fiqh muamalah. This study uses a qualitative method with a normative-empirical approach through literature studies, interviews, observations and documentation on @xxx Instagram account. The results indicate that business actors obtain official accounts using personal emails, but rent out their accounts commercially without the permission of the platform owner. This violates the terms and conditions in point (i) of clause 1.8 regarding rights and restrictions on the use of the Netflix application. Which causes obstacles in the form of erratic rental prices and permanent unilateral banning of Netflik and Instagram applications Based on the Copyright Law, this premium access rental transaction has legal consequences, including penalties as stipulated in article 9 of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright as a form of violation of the economic rights of creators who are threatened with criminal sanctions as per Article 113 of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, civil damages lawsuit and unilateral account banning by the Netflix application. While judging from haqq al-ibtikaar, the defect of the object of the contract on the @xxx account which originates from the violation of property rights (haqq al-ibtikaar) and the uncertainty of the system makes this lease-lease contract can result in the law becoming fasid (damaged), so that the transaction cannot be justified in contemporary jurisprudence.
References
[2] Adam, Panji . (2026). Ahli Fikih Mu'amalah, Wawancara Via Offline, Oleh Peneliti, Bandung, 22 Juni 2026, 13.40-14.15 WIB.
[3] Afifah, A. N. (2024). Jual Beli Yang Sah Menurut Islam: Ayat Al-Qur’an Dan Hadist Sebagai Pedoman. Al-A’mal: Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Syariah, 1(2), hlm 1.
[4] Andriansyah, F. dan. (2023). Analisis Hukum Ekonomi Syari’ah Tentang Akad Ijarah Alat Pemanen Padi Combine Harvester (Studi Kasus Di Kampung Simpang Asam Kecamatan Banjit). FALAH:Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 4(1), hlm 42–44.
[5] Armansyah. (2022). Hukum Perikatan (Akad) Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah: Melacak Jejak Fikih dalam PERMA Nomor 2 Tahun 2008 (1st ed.). KENCANA, hlm 124.
[6] Budianto, E. W. H. (2025). Akad Ijarah Dalam Fikih Muamalah Kajian Turats Dan Kontemporer (I). PT Afanin Media Utama, hlm 57.
[7] C, Salsabila . (2026). Pemilik Akun Intagram @Premiumapps.id_, Wawancara Via Online, Oleh Penelti, Bandung, 7 Juni 2026, 19.40-20.13 WIB.
[8] C, Salsabila . (2026). Pemilik Akun Intagram @Premiumapps.id_, Wawancara Via Online, Oleh Penelti, Bandung, 7 Juni 2026, 19.40-20.13 WIB.
[9] Hafiz Hudzaefi, U. S. dan L. D. (2023). Analisis Fikih Muamalah dan UU terkait Nilai Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Risert Ekonomi Syariah (JRES), 3(2), 122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29313/jres.v3i2.2815
[10] Indonesi, A. P. J. I. (2024). APJII Jumlah Pengguna Internet Indonesia Tembus 221 Juta Orang. Apjii.or.Id. https://apjii.or.id/berita/d/apjii-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-221-juta-orangturobian
[11] Indonesia, M. U. (2005). Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia Nomor: 1/MUNAS VII/MUI/5/2005 Tentang Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI).
[12] Kunaifi, M. dan A. (2020). Manajemen Lembaga Keuangan Dan Bisnis Islam (Panduan Praktikum Pada Lembaga Keuangan Dan Bisnis Islam). Duta Media Publishing, hlm 42-43.
[13] Mufid. (2021). Kaidah Fikih Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Kontemporer (2nd ed.). Prenada Media, hlm 113.
[14] Netflix. (n.d.). Syarat & Ketentuan. Netflix.Com. Retrieved July 10, 2026, from https://brand-netflix-com.translate.goog/en/terms/?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=id&_x_tr_hl=id&_x_tr_pto=tc
[15] Nurrisaa, F., & , Dina Herminab, N. (2025). Pendekatan Kualitatif dalam Penelitian: Strategi, Tahapan, dan Analisis Data. Teknologi Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran (JTPP), 2(3), hlm 797.
[16] Panji Adam, A. H. (2023). Ushul Fikih Ekonomi dan Bisnis (K. A. Ismail (ed.); I). Amzah, hlm 272.
[17] Renchmark. (2026). Pengalihan Hak Cipta: Panduan Lengkap dari Aturan sampai Praktiknya. Renchmark.Co.Id. https://www.renchmark.co.id/pengalihan-hak-cipta-panduan-lengkap/
[18] Sundusiyah, A. Z. H. (2025). Penerapan Ijarah Pada Produk Pembiayaan Di Perbankan Syariah. Margin: Journal Of Islamic Banking, 5(2), hlm 295–296.
[19] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta’ (Indonesia, 2014), pasal 1
[20] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta’ (Indonesia, 2014), pasal 9 ayat (1)
[21] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta’ (Indonesia, 2014), pasal 9 ayat (2) & (3)
[22] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta’ (Indonesia, 2014), pasal 113
[23] Usman, R. (2021). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual (I). KENCANA, hlm 26-85.
