Hubungan Social Support dengan Teacher Efficacy dimediasi oleh Work Engagement
Abstract
Abstract. Teacher efficacy is one factor that has the potential to differentiate between teachers, because there are differences in perceptions regarding efficacy when teaching to different students or in various situations. Social support is an important factor in teacher efficacy. Work Engagement can play a role in the relationship between social support and teacher efficacy. However, cultural differences can affect all three. Apart from that, social support can come from various sources outside of family, friends and those closest to you. This research aims to determine the relationship between social support and teacher efficacy through work engagement in 214 special education school teachers in Bandung City. The method used in this research is a quantitative method with Spearman Rank & Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) correlation test analysis. The measuring instrument used is the Revised-Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (R-MSPSS) measuring instrument developed by Ho and Chan and adapted by Oktarina et al (2021), Teacher's Sense of Efficacy Scale adapted by Maulana et al (2020) and The Utrecth Work Engagement Scale which has been adapted by Febrian Kristiana et al (2018). The research results show that there is a positive relationship between social support and teacher efficacy in special school teachers in Bandung City (r = 0.338). Then work engagement does not have a mediating role.
Abstrak. Teacher efficacy merupakan salah satu faktor yang berpotensi membedakan antar guru, karena terdapatnya perbedaan persepsi terkait efficacy ketika mengajar pada siswa yang berbeda atau dalam berbagai situasi. Social support merupakan faktor penting dalam teacher efficacy. Work Engagement dapat berperan dalam hubungan social support dan teacher efficacy. Namun, perbedaan budaya dapat mempengaruhi ketiganya. Selain itu, social support dapat muncul dari berbagai sumber di luar keluarga, teman, dan orang terdekat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan social support terhadap teacher efficacy melalui work engagement pada 214 orang guru SLB di Kota Bandung. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kuantitatif dengan analisis uji korelasi Spearman Rank & Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). Alat ukur yang digunakan adalah alat ukur Revised-Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (R-MSPSS) yang dikembangkan oleh Ho dan Chan dan diadaptasi oleh Oktarina et al (2021), Teacher’s Sense of Efficacy Scale diadaptasi oleh Maulana et al (2020) dan The Utrecth Work Engagement Scale yang telah diadaptasi oleh Febrian Kristiana et al (2018). Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa hubungan positif antara social support dan teacher efficacy pada guru SLB di Kota Bandung (r = 0,338). Lalu work engagement tidak memiliki peran sebagai mediasi.
References
Afrina, D., Rohiat, & Zakaria. (2019). Hubungan kepemimpinan instruksional kepala sekolah dan efikasi diri dengan kinerja mengajar guru. Manajer Pendidikan; Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana, 13(2).
Barni, D., Danioni, F., & Benevene, P. (2019). Teachers’ self-efficacy: The role of personal values and motivations for teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(JULY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01645
Caplan, R. D., Harrison, R. Van, Ions, R. V. W., & French, J. R. P. (1980). Social Support and Patient Adherence Experimental and Survey Findings. Research Report Series, Institute for Social Research.
Febrian Kristiana, I., Fajrianthi, & Purwono, U. (2018). Analisis rasch dalam utrecht work engagement scale-9 (uwes-9) versi bahasa indonesia. Jurnal Psikologi, 17(2), 204–217.
Mérida-López, S., Sánchez-Gómez, M., & Extremera, N. (2020). Leaving the Teaching Profession: Examining the Role of Social Support, Engagement and Emotional Intelligence in Teachers’ Intentions to Quit. Psychosocial Intervention, 29(3), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.5093/PI2020A10
Minghui, L., Lei, H., Xiaomeng, C., & Potmešilc, M. (2018). Teacher efficacy, work engagement, and social support among Chinese special education school teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(MAY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00648
Maulana, H., Rangkuti, A. A., & Dwiutami, L. (2020). Testing of the Indonesian version of the instrument teachers’ sense of efficacy scale using rasch modelling. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 35(2), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v35i1.2905
Oktarina, T. D., Cahyadi, S., & Susanto, H. (2021). Adaptasi revised-multidimesional scale of perceived social support pada guru di kota Bandung. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 7(2), 289. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i2.3259
Schaufeli, B. W., Salanova, M., Gonalez-Roma, V., & B. Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout:a two sample confirmatory factoranalytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. https://doi.org/https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805.
Ufaira, R. A., Imanda, A. N., Gunawan, L. R., Soeprapto, & Hedriani, W. (2020). Gambaran work engagement pada guru honorer sekolah dasar. Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi, 5(2). https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/Psikoislam/article/download/7096/5088
