Pengaruh Safety Climate terhadap Safety Behavior pada Pengemudi Truk Tangki Crude Palm Oil (CPO)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsps.v6i2.24505Keywords:
Safety Climate, Safety Behavior, Pengemudi Truk Tangki CPOAbstract
Abstract. Occupational safety in Crude Palm Oil (CPO) transportation is a critical concern due to the high risk of work-related accidents faced by tanker truck drivers. One factor that is assumed to influence safety behavior is safety climate, which refers to employees' perceptions of safety practices within the workplace. This study aimed to analyze the effect of safety climate on safety behavior among CPO tanker truck drivers at CV Bismillah Maju Bersama. A quantitative approach with a correlational design was employed. The study involved 65 drivers selected using a total sampling technique. Data were collected using the Nordic Occupational Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50) and a safety behavior scale, then analyzed using simple linear regression with IBM SPSS. The results indicated that safety climate had a positive and significant effect on safety behavior (t = 41.785; p < 0.001). The correlation coefficient (R = 0.982) demonstrated a very strong relationship, while the coefficient of determination (R² = 0.965) indicated that safety climate accounted for 96.5% of the variance in safety behavior. It can be concluded that improving the workplace safety climate enhances drivers' safety behavior. Therefore, organizations should strengthen management commitment, safety communication, training, and continuous supervision to foster safer work practices
Abstrak. Keselamatan kerja pada aktivitas pengangkutan Crude Palm Oil (CPO) menjadi perhatian penting karena tingginya risiko kecelakaan yang dihadapi pengemudi truk tangki. Salah satu faktor yang diduga memengaruhi perilaku keselamatan (safety behavior) adalah safety climate, yaitu persepsi pekerja terhadap penerapan keselamatan di lingkungan kerja. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh safety climate terhadap safety behavior pada pengemudi truk tangki CPO di CV Bismillah Maju Bersama. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain korelasional. Sampel berjumlah 65 pengemudi yang dipilih menggunakan teknik total sampling. Data dikumpulkan melalui Nordic Occupational Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50) dan skala safety behavior, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan regresi linear sederhana dengan bantuan IBM SPSS. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa safety climate berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap safety behavior (t = 41,785; p < 0,001). Nilai koefisien korelasi (R) sebesar 0,982 menunjukkan hubungan yang sangat kuat, sedangkan koefisien determinasi (R²) sebesar 0,965 menunjukkan bahwa safety climate memberikan kontribusi sebesar 96,5% terhadap safety behavior. Disimpulkan bahwa peningkatan safety climate di lingkungan kerja akan mendorong terbentuknya safety behavior yang lebih baik. Oleh karena itu, perusahaan perlu memperkuat komitmen manajemen, komunikasi keselamatan, pelatihan, dan pengawasan secara berkelanjutan
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. (2024). Laporan statistik kecelakaan kerja Indonesia tahun 2023. BPJS Ketenagakerjaan.
Christian, M. S., Bradley, J. C., Wallace, J. C., & Burke, M. J. (2009). Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1103–1127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016172
Clarke, S. (2006). The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.4.315
Clarke, S. (2010). An integrative model of safety climate: Linking psychological climate and work attitudes to individual safety outcomes using meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 553–578. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X452122
Clarke, S. (2013). Safety leadership: A meta-analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(1), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02064.x
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Cooper, M. D. (2000). Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Science, 36(2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00035-7
DeJoy, D. M. (2005). Behavior change versus culture change: Divergent approaches to managing workplace safety. Safety Science, 43(2), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2005.02.001
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS (9th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
International Labour Organization. (2024). Safety and health at work. International Labour Organization.
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403.
Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia. (2024). Profil keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja Indonesia. Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia.
Kines, P., Lappalainen, J., Mikkelsen, K. L., Olsen, E., Pousette, A., Tharaldsen, J., Tómasson, K., & Törner, M. (2011). Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50): A new tool for diagnosing occupational safety climate. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41(6), 634–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2011.08.004
Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science, 34(1–3), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00008-4
Neal, A., Griffin, M. A., & Hart, P. M. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science, 34(1–3), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00008-4
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 50 Tahun 2012 tentang Penerapan Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja.
Reason, J. (1997). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate.
Republik Indonesia. (1970). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1970 tentang Keselamatan Kerja. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1970 Nomor 1.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.
Törner, M. (2011). The social-physiology of safety: An integrative approach to understanding organisational psychological mechanisms behind safety performance. Safety Science, 49(8–9), 1262–1269.
Vinodkumar, M. N., & Bhasi, M. (2010). Safety management practices and safety behaviour: Assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(6), 2082–2093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.021
World Health Organization. (2023). Occupational health. World Health Organization.
Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96
Zohar, D. (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.587
Zohar, D. (2010). Thirty years of safety climate research: Reflections and future directions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(5), 1517–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.019
Zohar, D. (2021). Safety climate: Conceptualization, measurement, and relationships with safety behavior. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (3rd ed.). American Psychological Association.
