Work-life balance dan Quiet quitting: Peran Mediasi Kepuasan Kerja pada Pekerja Generasi Z

Authors

  • Malika Sandya Putri Prodi Psikologi, Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Islam Bandung, Indonesia
  • Rizka Hadian Permana Prodi Psikologi, Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Islam Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsps.v6i2.24425

Keywords:

Quiet quitting, Work-life balance, Kepuasan Kerja, Generasi Z, Mediator

Abstract

Abstract. The phenomenon of quiet quitting is increasingly common among Generation Z workers, who tend to withdraw from active engagement at work by performing only the minimum tasks stated in their job description. This study aims to examine the effect of work-life balance on quiet quitting and to analyze the mediating role of job satisfaction in explaining the mechanism of this relationship among Generation Z workers in Bandung City. A quantitative approach with a causal design was employed. The sample consisted of 262 Generation Z workers in Bandung who had worked for at least six months, selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected through an online questionnaire measuring quiet quitting, work-life balance, and job satisfaction, and were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with SmartPLS 4. Descriptive results show that the work-life balance of Generation Z workers in Bandung falls into the high category, while their quiet quitting tendency is reflected through detachment, lack of motivation, and lack of initiative. Job satisfaction is reflected in positive evaluations of nine job aspects. Work-life balance negatively and significantly affects quiet quitting (β = -0.471, p < 0.05), and job satisfaction is proven to partially mediate this relationship with a smaller but significant effect (β = -0.145, p < 0.05). These findings imply that organizations should attend not only to work-life balance policies but also to strategies that enhance the job satisfaction of Generation Z employees

Abstrak. Fenomena quiet quitting makin banyak terjadi di kalangan pekerja generasi Z, yang memperlihatkan perilaku menarik diri dari keterlibatan aktif di tempat kerja dengan hanya menjalankan tugas minimal sesuai deskripsi pekerjaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh work-life balance terhadap quiet quitting, serta menganalisis peran kepuasan kerja sebagai variabel mediator yang menerangkan mekanisme hubungan diantara work-life balance dan quiet quitting pada pekerja generasi Z di Kota Bandung. Penelitian memakai pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain kausalitas. Sampel penelitian sejumlah 262 pekerja generasi Z di Kota Bandung yang telah bekerja minimal enam bulan, dipilih mempergunakan teknik convenience sampling. Pengumpulan data dilaksanakan melalui kuesioner online yang mengukur quiet quitting, work-life balance, dan kepuasan kerja. Analisis data memakai Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) dengan SmartPLS 4. Hasil deskriptif memperlihatkan bahwa work-life balance pekerja Generasi Z di Kota Bandung berada pada kategori tinggi, sedangkan kecenderungan quiet quitting tergambar melalui perilaku pembatasan keterlibatan kerja yang tercermin dari tiga dimensi, yaitu keterpisahan, kurangnya motivasi, dan kurangnya inisiatif. Kepuasan kerja tercermin dari penilaian positif terhadap sembilan aspek pekerjaan. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan work-life balance berdampak negatif dan signifikan kepada quiet quitting (β = -0,471, p < 0,05), dan kepuasan kerja terbukti berperan sebagai mediator parsial dengan pengaruh yang signifikan namun lebih rendah (β = -0,145, p < 0,05). Studi ini memberikan implikasi bagi organisasi untuk tidak hanya berfokus pada kebijakan keseimbangan kerja-kehidupan, tetapi juga pada upaya peningkatan kepuasan kerja pekerja Generasi Z.

References

Agarwal, H., & Vaghela, P. (2018). Work values of Gen Z: Bridging the gap to the next generation. National Conference on Innovative Business Management Practices in 21th Century, (December 2018), 1–26.
Efendi, M. A., Hawabi, A. I., & Purwaningtyas, E. K. (2023). The effect of work-life balance on quiet quitting in millennial generation workers (Number Pfh). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-188-3_6
Erdfelder, E., FAul, F., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Fisher, G. G., Bulger, C. A., & Smith, C. S. (2009). Beyond Work and Family: A Measure of Work/Nonwork Interference and Enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016737
Formica, S., & Sfodera, F. (2022). The Great Resignation and Quiet Quitting paradigm shifts: An overview of current situation and future research directions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 31(8), 899–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2022.2136601
Galanis, P., Katsiroumpa, A., Vraka, I., Siskou, O., Konstantakopoulou, O., Moisoglou, I., Gallos, P., & Kaitelidou, D. (2023). The quiet quitting scale: Development and initial validation. AIMS Public Health, 10(4), 828–848. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2023055
Greenhaus, J. H., Collins, K. M., & Shaw, J. D. (2003). The relation between work-family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 510–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00042-8
Gunawan, G. (2019). Reliabilitas Dan Validitas Konstruk Work Life Balance Di Indonesia. JPPP - Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengukuran Psikologi, 8(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.21009/jppp.082.05
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Klotz, A. C., & Bolino, M. C. (2022). When Quiet Quitting Is Worse Than the Real Thing. Harvard Business Review, 1(1), 1–6. https://hbr.org/2022/09/when-quiet-quitting-is-worse-than-the-real-thing
Mahand, T., & Caldwell, C. (2023). Quiet Quitting – Causes and Opportunities. Business and Management Research, 12(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v12n1p9
Michael, D. (2018). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and post- Millennials begin. Pew Research Center, 1, 6–9. https://fbuxconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Where-Millennials-end-and-post-Millennials-begin-_-Pew-Research-Center-1.pdf%0A21 08 2023 20 39
Nguyen, H. T., & Vu, M. H. (2025). Quiet Quitting: Insights from Generation Z workers in Vietnam. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 13(01), 8267–8282. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v13i01.em08
Paranamana, G. K., & Kaluarachchige, I. P. (2025). Impact of Work Life Balance and Job Burnout on Quiet Quitting with the Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction of Factory Employees in a Battery Manufacturing Company in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Journal of Management Studies, 6(2), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.4038/sljms.v6i2.153
Serenko, A. (2024). The human capital management perspective on quiet quitting: recommendations for employees, managers, and national policymakers. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2022-0792
Shah, D., & Parekh, M. (2023). Understanding work-life balance: An analysis of quiet quitting and age dynamics using deep learning. International Research Journal of Engineering Technology, 1(06), 1230–1235.
Spector, E. P. (2012). Sage Academic Books Job Satisfaction : Application , Assessment , Causes , and Consequences.
Tasya Berlian Cittra Friyanti, & Ali Mubarak. (2024). Studi Kontribusi Job Satisfaction terhadap Quiet Quitting pada Karyawan Bank X. Bandung Conference Series: Psychology Science, 4(2), 1141–1148. https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsps.v4i2.12988

Published

2026-07-31