Cinta di Era Algoritma: Tinjauan Naratif pada Fenomena Fictophilia

Authors

  • Nasywa Annisa Salsabilla Prodi Psikologi, Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Islam Bandung, Indonesia
  • Yunita Sari Prodi Psikologi, Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Islam Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsps.v6i2.24250

Keywords:

Fictophilia, Kelekatan, KesejahteraanPsikologis

Abstract

Abstract. The rapid advancement of digital technology has intensified interactions with fictional characters, giving rise to fictophilia, a strong emotional and/or sexual attraction toward fictional characters. Despite growing scholarly interest, empirical evidence on its psychological impacts remains limited. This study reviewed empirical research on the psychological impacts of fictophilia using a narrative literature review based on Ferrari's framework. Literature was searched in Google Scholar, Springer Nature, and ScienceDirect. Articles were screened using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria with Rayyan AI and synthesized thematically. Of 86 identified articles, four empirical studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings indicate that fictophilia is associated with attachment dynamics, influences romantic partner preferences, and may provide emotional closeness while partially fulfilling affective needs. However, relationships with fictional characters cannot replace the reciprocity, trust, and commitment found in human relationships. Evidence regarding the role of fictophilia in emotion regulation and coping also remains limited, highlighting the need for further research

Abstrak. Perkembangan teknologi digital telah meningkatkan intensitas interaksi individu dengan karakter fiksi sehingga memunculkan fenomena fictophilia, yaitu ketertarikan emosional dan/atau seksual yang kuat terhadap karakter fiksi. Meskipun semakin banyak dikaji, bukti empiris mengenai dampak psikologis fictophilia masih terbatas dan tersebar pada berbagai jenis media. Penelitian ini bertujuan meninjau penelitian terkait dampak psikologis fictophilia melalui pendekatan narrative literature review. Penelitian menggunakan metode narrative literature review dengan kerangka Ferrari. Pencarian literatur dilakukan melalui Google Scholar, Springer Nature, dan ScienceDirect. Artikel diseleksi berdasarkan kriteria inklusi dan eksklusi menggunakan Rayyan AI, kemudian disintesis secara tematik. Dari 86 artikel yang diidentifikasi, empat artikel empiris memenuhi seluruh kriteria dan dianalisis dalam tinjauan ini. Hasil sintesis menunjukkan bahwa fictophilia berkaitan dengan dinamika kelekatan, mempengaruhi preferensi pasangan romantis, serta berpotensi memberikan pengalaman kedekatan emosional dan memenuhi sebagian kebutuhan afektif. Meskipun demikian, hubungan dengan karakter fiksi belum mampu menggantikan aspek relasional yang bergantung pada resiprositas, kepercayaan, dan komitmen dalam hubungan antarmanusia. Selain itu, bukti empiris mengenai peran fictophilia dalam regulasi emosi dan coping masih terbatas sehingga memerlukan penelitian lebih lanjut yang menguji kedua aspek tersebut secara langsung.

References

APJII. (2025). Survei penetrasi dan perilaku pengguna internet Indonesia 2025. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. https://survei.apjii.or.id
BBC News. (2019, 17 Agustus). Why I “married” a cartoon character. https://www.bbc.com/pidgin/world-49380881
Bolderston, A. (2008). Writing an Effective Literature Review. Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences, 39(2), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2008.04.009
Chalouche, A. (2026, 12 Februari). More & more women are getting into AI relationships. Institute for Family Studies. https://ifstudies.org/in-the-news/more-more-women-are-getting-into-ai-relationships
Collins, J. A., & Fauser, B. C. (2005). Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews. Human reproduction update, 11(2), 103–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmh058
Curry, M. (2026, 26 Februari). I've been single for 4 years. Is my smut-reading habit to blame? Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/smut-books-ruin-dating-8685580
Derish, P. A., & Annesley, T. M. (2011). How to write a rave review. Clinical chemistry, 57(3), 388–391. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2010.160622
Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329
Gasparyan, A. Y., Ayvazyan, L., Blackmore, H., & Kitas, G. D. (2011). Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatology international, 31(11), 1409–1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-1999-3
Giard, A. (2019). L’amour d’air au Japon. Rituels de rencontre avec des voix venues d’ailleurs. Gradhiva, 29, 116–139. https://doi.org/10.4000/gradhiva.4082
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
Karhulahti, V. M., & Välisalo, T. (2021). Fictosexuality, Fictoromance, and Fictophilia: A Qualitative Study of Love and Desire for Fictional Characters. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 575427. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575427
Katsenou, R. (2023). Falling in love with Miku: An interpretive approach to human-robot interaction. Dalam Taboo – Transgression – Transcendence in Art & Science 2023 (hlm. 257–276).
Lam, K. Y. (2016). The Hatsune Miku phenomenon: More than a virtual J-Pop diva. The Journal of Popular Culture, 49(5), 1107–1124. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12455
Niu, J., She, W., Cheng, W., Dou, X., & Jia, X. (2026). Character style and relational judgments in human–AI romance: Trust, commitment, intimacy, and passion. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1819889. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1819889
O'Connor, T. R., & Holmquist, G. P. (2009). Algorithm for writing a scientific manuscript. Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 37(6), 344–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20329
Park, J. I., Blomkvist, A., & Mahmut, M. K. (2022). The differentiation between consumers of hentai pornography and human pornography. Sexologies, 31(3), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sexol.2021.11.002
Pautasso M. (2013). Ten simple rules for writing a literature review. PLoS computational biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149
Pei, Q., Chen, Y., Fan, H., Liang, J., & Xu, B. (2025). The impact of game character identification on otome game players' mate selection criteria. BMC Psychology, 13, 831. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03154-5
Randolph, J. (2009). A guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 14(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.7275/b0az-8t74
Ritchie, H., Mathieu, E., Roser, M., & Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2023). Internet. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/internet
Urcelay Alonso, J. (2026, 7 Maret). Falling in love with an algorithm is not science fiction: Gemini already faces a lawsuit. Omnes Magazine. https://www.omnesmag.com/en/signatures/falling-in-love-with-a-gem-algorithm/
Wang, N. Z. M., & Teoh, A. N. (2026). Do the traits of fictional crushes and real-life ideals align? An investigation into ideal standards based on fictional fandoms. Psychology of Popular Media, 15(3), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000646
Yuan, Y., & Hunt, R. H. (2009). Systematic reviews: the good, the bad, and the ugly. The American journal of gastroenterology, 104(5), 1086–1092. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.118

Published

2026-07-31