Pengaruh Religiusitas terhadap Penalaran Moral pada Mahasiswa yang Mengikuti Organisasi Kemahasiswaan di Universitas Islam Bandung
Abstract
Abstract. Participating in student organizations exposes students to difficult moral conundrums, including managing resources, addressing internal organizational problems, and making decisions in social confrontations. Religion is seen as one of the key elements that can influence students' moral reasoning in the context of Islamic universities, such Universitas Islam Bandung. Intellectual, ideological, private, public, and religious experiences are all components of religiosity. Finding out how religiosity affects moral reasoning among students involved in student groups at the Islamic University of Bandung is the aim of this study. This study employs several linear regression analysis approaches in a causal quantitative manner. The CRS-15, created by Huber & Huber and translated into Indonesian by Nugraha, and the moral reasoning assessment, created by Kohlberg and modified by Budiningsih, were the instruments utilized in this study. 420 seventh-semester students who were involved in student organizations at the Islamic University of Bandung made up the study's sample. The study's findings indicate that the religiosity variable has a 2% concurrent impact on moral reasoning. Out of all the dimensions, only the ideology dimension has a negative effect on moral reasoning (.166). The findings of this study can be applied to the creation of curricula and exercises that teach students how to apply religion to moral quandaries in daily life.
Abstrak. Mahasiswa yang tergabung dalam organisasi kemahasiswaan sering dihadapkan pada dilema moral yang kompleks, seperti pengambilan keputusan dalam konflik sosial, pengelolaan sumber daya, dan penyelesaian masalah internal organisasi. Dalam konteks perguruan tinggi Islam, seperti Universitas Islam Bandung, religiusitas dipandang sebagai salah satu faktor penting yang dapat membentuk penalaran moral mahasiswa. Religiusitas mencakup dimensi Intellectual, Ideology, Public Practice, Private Practice, dan Religious Experience. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaruh religiusitas terhadap penalaran moral pada mahasiswa yang mengikuti organisasi kemahasiswaan di Universitas Islam Bandung. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif kausalitas dengan teknik analisis regresi linear berganda. Alat ukur yang digunakan pada penelitian ini yaitu CRS-15 yang dikembangkan oleh Huber & Huber dan telah diadaptasi ke Bahasa Indonesia oleh Nugraha lalu alat ukur penalaran moral yang dikembangkan oleh Kohlberg dan telah diadaptasi oleh Budiningsih. Sampel pada penelitian ini sebanyak 420 mahasiswa semester 7 yang mengikuti organisasi kemahasiswaan di Universitas Islam Bandung. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat pengaruh secara simultan pada variabel religiusitas terhadap penalaran moral sebesar 2%. Adapun pengaruh tiap-tiap dimensi hanya dimensi Ideology saja yang memberikan pengaruh negatif sebesar .166 terhadap penalaran moral.
References
Arli, D., & Chowdhury, M. (2021). Religious But Not Ethical: The Effect of Extrinsic Religiosity, Ethnocentrism and Self-Righteousness on Consumers Ethical Judgment.
Berk, L. E., (2018). Development Through the Lifespan (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Bostyn, D. H., Sevenhant, S., & Roets, A. (2018). Hypothetical Judment Versus Real-Life Behavior in Trolley-Style Moral Dilemmas. Psychological Science, 29(7), 1084-1095. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617752640.
Chowdhury, M. (2016). Emphasizing Morals, Values, Ethics, And Character Education in Science Education and Science Teaching. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 4(2).
Feldman, K. A., & Newcomb, T. M. (1969). The Impact of College on Students. Transaction Publishers.
Haidt, J. (2001). The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.
Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religion, 3(2), 710–724. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710.
Kurniawan, A., Daeli, S. I., Asbari, M. & Santoso, G. (2023). Krisis Moral Remaja di Era Digital. Literaksi: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 01(02), 21-25.
Mamarasulovich, A. B. (2022). Religious and Philosophical Foundations of Human Moral Development. American Journal of Interdiciplinary Research and Development, 11, 154-163.
Mustafa, S., & Rizal, M. (2019). Religiosity as a Predictor of Ethical Behavior Among University Students. Journal of Islamic Studies, 10(3), 211–223.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2024). Criminal Incidents at Postsecondary Institutions. Condition of Education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
Nugraha, S., Poerwandari, E. K., Utoyo, D. B. (2021). Confirmatory Analysis of The Indonesian Version of The Centrality of Religiosity Scale. Mimbar, 37(2), 529-538.
Papilaya, J. O., & Huliselan, N. (2016). Identifikasi Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi Undip, 15(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.14710/jpu.15.1.56-63.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P., (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rest, J., Thoma, S., & Edwards, L. (1997). Designing and validating a measure of moral judgment: Stage preference and stage consistency approaches. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.5.
Taufik, M. (2020). Strategic Role of Islamic Religious Education in Strengthening Character Education in The Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura vol. 20, 86-104.
