Pengaruh Religiusitas terhadap Subjective Well-Being pada Penyintas Kanker Payudara
Abstract
Abstract. Religiosity is understood as an individual's belief in their religion, which is reflected in the extent to which religious teachings are lived and internalized in daily behavior and outlook on life, while subjective well-being refers to an individual's assessment of their own life, which includes feelings of satisfaction with life (life satisfaction), level of happiness, and emotional well-being. This study aims to examine the effect of religiosity on subjective well-being in breast cancer survivors in Bandung City with a total of 33 breast cancer survivors. Quantitative methods are used as an approach in this study. The measuring instrument used is The Centrality of Religiosity Scale Interreligious (CRSi) by Huber and Huber (2012) which has been adapted by Mubarak, Ali (2023). The subjective well-being measuring instrument is The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) developed by Diener et al. (1985) and has been adapted by Ade Irma and Raudatussalamah (2018). Then, The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) compiled by Watson et al. (1988) which has also been adapted by Ade Irma and Raudatussalamah (2018). The data was processed using simple linear regression with the results of the study showing that religiosity has a significant contribution of 20.8% to subjective well-being.
Abstrak. Religiusitas dipahami sebagai keyakinan individu terhadap agamanya, yang tercermin dari sejauh mana ajaran agama dihayati dan diinternalisasi dalam perilaku dan pandangan hidup sehari-hari, sementara subjective well-being merujuk pada penilaian individu terhadap kehidupannya sendiri, yang mencakup perasaan puas dengan hidup (life satisfaction), tingkat kebahagiaan, dan kesejahteraan emosional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh religiusitas terhadap subjective well-being pada penyintas kanker payudara di Kota Bandung dengan jumlah subjek sebanyak 33 penyintas kanker payudara. Metode kuantitatif dipakai sebagai pendekatan dalam penelitian ini. Alat ukur yang dimanfaatkan, yaitu The Centrality of Religiosity Scale Interreligious (CRSi) oleh Huber dan Huber (2012) yang telah diadaptasi oleh Mubarak, Ali (2023). Alat ukur subjective well-being, yaitu The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) yang dikembangkan oleh Diener et al. (1985) dan telah diadaptasi oleh Ade Irma dan Raudatussalamah (2018). Kemudian, The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) yang disusun oleh Watson et al. (1988) yang juga telah diadaptasi oleh Ade Irma dan Raudatussalamah (2018). Data diolah menggunakan regresi linier sederhana dengan hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa religiusitas memiliki kontribusi signifikan sebesar 20.8% terhadap subjective well-being.
References
Badana, A. N. S., Marino, V. R., Templeman, M. E., McMillan, S. C., Tofthagen, C. S., Small, B. J., & Haley, W. E. (2019). Understanding the roles of patient symptoms and subjective appraisals in well-being among breast cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 27(11), 4245–4252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04707-2
Budianto, A. (2021, February 5). Kanker Payudara Jadi Penyebab Kematian Tertinggi Perempuan di Kota Bandung. INews Jabar. https://jabar.inews.id/berita/kanker-payudara-jadi-penyebab-kematian-tertinggi-perempuan-di-kota-bandung
Compton, W., & Hoffman, E. (2012). Positive Psychology The Science of Happiness and Flourishing (Second Edition). Jon-David Hague.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsem, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Diener, E., Pressman, S. D., Hunter, J., & Delgadillo-Chase, D. (2017). If, Why, and When Subjective Well-Being Influences Health, and Future Needed Research. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 9(2), 133–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12090
Globocan. (2022). Cancer Today. International Agency for Research on Cancer. https://gco.iarc.who.int/media/globocan/factsheets/populations/360-indonesia-fact-sheet.pdf
Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3), 710–724. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710
Mubarak, Ali. (2023). Peran Religiosity dan Spirituality terhadap Employee Well-Being melalui Perceived Organizational Support pada Dosen Perguruan Tinggi Berbasis Agama di Jawa Barat.
Pérez, S., & Rohde, D. (2022). The Relationship Between Religious/Spiritual Beliefs and Subjective Well-Being: A Case-Based Comparative Cross-National Study. Journal of Religion and Health, 61(6), 4585–4607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01550-4
Verghese, A. (2008). Spirituality and Mental Health. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 50(4), 233–237.
Villani, D., Sorgente, A., Iannello, P., & Antonietti, A. (2019). The role of spirituality and religiosity in subjective well-being of individuals with different religious status. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(JULY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01525
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. In Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 54, Issue 6).
World Health Organization. (2022, February 3). Cancer. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer
Wulandari, Novia., Bahar, Hartati., & Suriani, C. (2017). Gambaran Kualitas Hidup pada Penderita Kanker Payudara di Rumah Sakit Umum Bahteramas Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara Tahun 2017. JIMKESMAS, 2(6), 1–9.
Yu, Y., & Sherman, K. A. (2015). Communication avoidance, coping and psychological distress of women with breast cancer. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38(3), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-015-9636-3
