Hubungan Psychological Well-Being dan Job Performance pada Karyawan PT X di Kabupaten Karawang
Abstract
Abstract. Job performance is one of the key factors in determining the success of an organization. To achieve organizational goals, companies are required to provide optimal welfare to their employees. Based on Tire Production data at PT X, a decrease in production results occurred in 2021-2022 with a difference of 2%. This also happened at the beginning of 2024 which did not reach the production target with a lack of 8,479 pieces of tires. In addition, PT X employees show low psychological well-being characterized by the dimension of environmental mastery, where they have difficulty in managing work affairs, thus hampering their work productivity. Based on this phenomenon, the problems in this study are: (1) How is psychological well-being in PT X employees in Karawang Regency? (2) How is job performance in PT X employees in Karawang Regency? (3) Is there a relationship between psychological well-being and job performance in PT X employees in Karawang Regency? Researchers used the Rank Spearman Correlational analysis technique method using a quantitative approach. The population in this study were employees in the Production Department of PT X in Karawang Regency, totaling 1,100 employees with a sampling technique, namely Simple Random Sampling, obtained a total research sample of 285 employees. The data collection techniques used in this study were questionnaires, interviews, and literature studies. The data analysis technique used in this research is descriptive analysis technique. The result of this study is that there is a positive relationship between psychological well-being and job performance in PT X employees in Karawang Regency by 59.4% which is included in the moderate category.
Abstrak. Job perfomance merupakan salah satu faktor kunci dalam menentukan keberhasilan suatu organisasi. Untuk mencapai tujuan organisasi, perusahaan dituntut untuk memberikan kesejahteraan yang optimal kepada karyawan mereka. Berdasarkan data Tire Production pada PT X, penurunan hasil produksi terjadi pada tahun 2021-2022 dengan selisih 2%. Hal tersebut terjadi juga pada awal tahun 2024 yang tidak mencapai target produksi dengan kurangnya 8.479 pieces ban. Selain itu, karyawan PT X menunjukkan kesejahteraan psikologis yang rendah ditandai pada dimensi penguasaan lingkungan, dimana mereka kesulitan dalam mengelola urusan pekerjaan sehingga menghambat produktivitas kerjanya. Berdasarkan fenomena tersebut, maka permasalahan dalam penelitian ini, yaitu: (1) Bagaimana psychological well-being pada karyawan PT X di Kabupaten Karawang? (2) Bagaimana job performance pada karyawan PT X di Kabupaten Karawang? (3) Apakah terdapat hubungan antara psychological well-being dengan job performance pada karyawan PT X di Kabupaten Karawang?. Peneliti menggunakan metode teknik analisis Rank Spearman Correlasional dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah karyawan di Departemen Produksi PT X Kabupaten Karawang yang berjumlah 1.100 karyawan dengan teknik pengambilan sampel yaitu Simple Random Sampling diperoleh jumlah sampel penelitian sebanyak 285 karyawan. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kuesioner, wawancara, dan studi pustaka. Adapun teknik analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teknis analisis deskriptif. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah terdapat hubungan positif antara psychological well-being dengan job performance pada karyawan PT X di Kabupaten Karawang sebesar 59,4% yang termasuk kategori sedang.
References
Darmawan, S. A., & Dwarawati, D. (2023). Pengaruh Work Life Balance terhadap Employee Well-Being pada Guru SLB. Jurnal Riset Psikologi, 3(2), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrp.v3i2.2952
Daniels, K., & Harris, C. (2000). Work, Psychological Well-Being and Job Performance. Occupational Medicine, 304-309.
Dwiliesanty, & Yudiarso. (2022). Rasch Analysis of The Indonesian Version of Individual Work Performance Questionnaire )IWPQ(. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 153-167.
Edgar, F., Geare, A., & Zhang, J. A. (2017). A Comprehensive Concomitant Analysis of Service Employees’ Well-Being and Performance. Personnel Review, 1-23.
Koopmans, e. (2011). Conceptual Frameworks of Individual Work Performance: A Systematic Review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 856-866.
Koopmans, e. (2012). Development of an Individual Work Performance Questionnaire. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 6-28.
Koopmans, e. (2014). Construct Validity of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire . Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 153 171.
Koopmans, e. (2014). Improving the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire using Rasch Analysis. Journal of Applied Measurement, 123-149. Koopmans, e. )2014(. Measuring Individual Work Performance-Identifying and Selecting Indicators. Zutphen: CPI Koninklijke Wöhrmann.
Kulachai, e. (2023). Validating Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ): A Second Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis . PROCEEDINGS OF PSMP INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE , 12-23.
Kundi, e. (2021). Employee Psychological Well-Being and Job Performance: Exploring Mediating and Moderating Mechanisms. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 736-754
Islamy, T. P., Widawati, L., & Utami, A. T. (2023). Pengaruh Psychological Well-Being terhadap Work Engagement pada Karyawan Direktorat Operasional. Jurnal Riset Psikologi, 3(2), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrp.v3i2.2764
Daniels, K., & Harris, C. (2000). Work, Psychological Well-Being and Job Performance. Occupational Medicine, 304-309.
Dwiliesanty, & Yudiarso. (2022). Rasch Analysis of The Indonesian Version of Individual Work Performance Questionnaire )IWPQ(. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 153-167.
Edgar, F., Geare, A., & Zhang, J. A. (2017). A Comprehensive Concomitant Analysis of Service Employees’ Well-Being and Performance. Personnel Review, 1-23.
Koopmans, e. (2011). Conceptual Frameworks of Individual Work Performance: Systematic Review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 856-866.
Koopmans, e. (2012). Development of an Individual Work Performance Questionnaire. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 6-28.
Koopmans, e. (2014). Construct Validity of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire . Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 153 171.
Koopmans, e. (2014). Improving the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire using Rasch Analysis. Journal of Applied Measurement, 123-149. Koopmans, e. )2014(. Measuring Individual Work Performance-Identifying and Selecting Indicators. Zutphen: CPI Koninklijke Wöhrmann.
Kulachai, e. (2023). Validating Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ): A Second Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis . PROCEEDINGS OF PSMP INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE , 12-23.
Kundi, e. (2021). Employee Psychological Well-Being and Job Performance: Exploring Mediating and Moderating Mechanisms. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 736-754
Mishra, H., & Venkatesan, M. (2022). Psychological Well-being of Employees, its Precedents and Outcomes: A Literature Review and Proposed Framework. Management and Labour Studies, 1-36.
Rachmayani, & Ramdhani. (2014). Adaptasi Bahasa dan Budaya Skala Psychological Well-Being. Proceeding Seminar Nasional Psikometri, 253 268.
Rahmawati, S. N., Zulaifah, E., & Akmala, L. A. (2022). Persepsi Dukungan Organisasi dan Kinerja Karyawan: Studi Metaanalisis Terhadap Penelitian di Indonesia. Psikologika, 379-402. doi:10.20885/psikologika.vol27.iss2.art10
Ramdani, e. (2019). The Individual Work Performance Scale: A Psychometric Study and its Application for Employee Performance. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 405-414.
Ramos-Villagrasa, e. (2019). Assessing Job Performance Using Brief Self-report Scales: The Case of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 195-205.
Revelia, M. (2018). Uji Validitas Konstruk pada Instrumen Psychological Well-Being Ryff's Scale dengan Metode Conformatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 8-14.
Rijal, & Abdullah. (2020). Pengaruh Lifestyle, Psychological Well-Being, dan Self-Efficacy terhadap Kinerja Auditor dengan Task Complexity sebagai Pemoderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi : Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi, 22-43.
Robbins, & Judge. (2013). Organizational Behavior. New York: Pearson.
Robertson, I. T., & Cooper, C. (2010). Full Engagement: the Integration of Employee Engagement and Psychological Well-Being. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 324-336.Ryff, & Keyes. (1995). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 719-727.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness Is Everything, or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1069-1081. 47
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1996). Psychological Well-Being: Meaning, Measurement, and Implications for Psychotherapy Research. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 65)1(, 14-23. doi:10.1159/000289026
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The Contours of Positive Human Health. Psychological Inquiry, 9)1(, 1-28. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0901_1.
Shanmugam, B., & Ganapathi, R. (2019). A Research on Psychological Well-Being and Job Performance of Employees in Msme in Coimbatore District. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 709-712.
Ramadhani, A. F., & Mubarak, A. (2023). Studi Kontribusi Perceived Organizational Support terhadap Employee Well-Being. Jurnal Riset Psikologi, 3(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrp.v3i2.2766
Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Psychological Well-Being and Job Satisfaction as Predictors of Job Performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology , 84-94.
