Hubungan antara Persepsi Remaja terhadap Perilaku Phubbing Orang Tua dengan Kesejahteraan Subjektif Remaja
Abstract
Abstrack. The spread of gadgets and Indonesian government policies have encouraged more and more people to use the internet, supporting the development of technology in Bandung City from 2015 until now in its community governance has created the phenomenon of phubbing, where parents' attention to gadgets is greater than attention to their children.forming subjective interpretations, where children feel neglected because parents prefer gadgets. The impact of parental phubbing affects children's psychological and cognitive mechanisms in the perception of disinterest and difficulty building relationships between parents and students. This is negative because the relationship between parents and adolescents is one source of family experience that is strongly correlated to be a major contribution to children's well-being. This study aims to see the description of the contribution of parental phubbing with subjective well-being (SWB) in Bandung City, aged 12-16 years (49.2% male students; 50.8% female students), with the majority coming from middle economic status families (78%), obtained through cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used include Parental Phubbing Scale, Children's Worlds Subjective Well-Being Scale 5, and Children's Worlds Positive Affect Negative Affect Scale given through questionnaires (G-form). This analysis used frequencies, percentages, contigency tables, and compare means to compare respondent characteristics and parental phubbing levels; respondent characteristics and subjective well-being. The purpose of the analysis was to describe the profile of respondents and examine the relationship between demographic variables and the frequency of parental phubbing behavior. The results showed that students' SWB was significantly lower than average (M = 71.08; SD = 26.72) at (P<.01). The findings indicated that moderate levels of parental phubbing had little effect on SWB but increased students' negative feelings (R² CW-SWBS5 = 3.7%; R² CW-PANAS (NA)= 14.5%).
Abstrak. Penyebaran gadget dan kebijakan pemerintah Indonesia telah mendorong semakin banyak orang menggunakan internet, mendukung perkembangan teknologi pada Kota Bandung mulai 2015 hingga sekarang dalam tatakelola masyarakatnya telah menciptakan fenomena phubbing, di mana perhatian orang tua terhadap gadget lebih besar daripada perhatian kepada anak mereka.Membentuk interpretasi subjektif, dimana anak merasa diabaikan karena orang tua lebih menyukai gadget. Dampak parental phubbing ini mempengaruhi mekanisme psikologis dan kognitif anak dalam persepsi ketidaktertarikan dan kesulitan membangun hubungan antara orang tua dan siswa. Hal ini menjadi negatif dikarenakan hubungan orang tua dan remaja menjadi salah satu sumber pengalaman keluarga yang berkorelasi kuat menjadi sumbangan besar pada kesejahteraan anak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat gambaran kontribusi parental phubbing dengan kesejahteraan subjektif di Kota Bandung, berusia 12-16 tahun (49.2% siswa laki-laki; 50.8% siswa perempuan), dengan mayoritas berasal dari keluarga berstatus ekonomi menengah (78%), diperoleh melalui Teknik cluster random sampling. Instrumen yang digunakan meliputi Parental Phubbing Scale, Children’s Worlds Subjective Well-Being Scale 5, dan Children’s Worlds Positive Affect Negative Affect Scale yang diberikan melalui kuisioner (G-form). Analisis ni menggunakan frekuensi, presentase, table kontigensi, dan compare means untuk membandingkan karakteristik responden dan tingkat parental phubbing; karakteristik responden dan kesejahteraan subjektif. Tujuan analisis adalah untuk menggambarkan profil responden dan menguji hubungan antara variable demografis dengan frekuensi perilaku parental phubbing. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa kesejahteraan subjektif siswa signifikan lebih rendah dari rata-rata (M = 71.08; SD = 26.72) pada (P<.01). Temuan ini menunjukan bahwa parental phubbing dalam tingkat sedang memiliki pengaruh kecil terhadap kesejahteraan subjektif tetapi meningkatkan perasaan negatif siswa (R² CW-SWBS5 = 3.7%; R² CW-PANAS (NA)= 14.5%).
References
Al-Saggaf, Y. (2022). Parents’ Phubbing of Children. The Psychology of Phubbing, 9(19).
Anderson, M. (2018, May 31). Teens, Social Media and Technology 2018. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. (2022). Laporan Survei Internet APJII 2011-2022 Q1. Jakarta: Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia.
Baron, N. S., & Campbell, E. M. (2012). Gender and mobile phones in cross-national context. Language Sciences, 34(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.018
Borualogo, I. S., & Casas, F. (2021). Subjective well-being of Indonesian children: A perspective of material well-being [Kesejahteraan subjektif Anak Indonesia: Sebuah Perspektif kesejahteraan materi]. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 36(2), 204–230. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v36i2.2880
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12506
Cummins, R. A. (2014). Understanding the well-being of children and adolescents through homeostatic theory. Handbook of Child Well-Being, 635–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_152
Darmawan, S. A., & Dwarawati, D. (2023). Pengaruh Work Life Balance terhadap Employee Well-Being pada Guru SLB. Jurnal Riset Psikologi, 3(2), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrp.v3i2.2952
Dictionary.com. (n.d.). Dictionary.com. https://www.dictionary.com/
Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2008). Children's Subjective Well-Being: The art and science of measuring SWB in children. New York: Guilford Press.
Frackowiak, M., Ochs, C., Wolfers, L., & Vanden Abeele, M. (2023). Commentary: Technoference or parental phubbing? A call for greater conceptual and operational clarity of parental smartphone use around children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13917
Gani Ghobadi. (2020). Sejarah Perkembangan Internet Di Indonesia. Journal Universitas Sudarma, vol.5.
Gilman, R., & Huebner, S. (2003). A review of Life Satisfaction Research with children and adolescents. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.18.2.192.21858
Harianti, W. S., & Kurniawan, I. N. (2022). Parental phubbing and mental well-being: Preliminary study in Indonesia. Communications in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.21924/chss.2.2.2022.34
Islamy, T. P., Widawati, L., & Utami, A. T. (2023). Pengaruh Psychological Well-Being terhadap Work Engagement pada Karyawan Direktorat Operasional. Jurnal Riset Psikologi, 3(2), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrp.v3i2.2764
Kardefelt-Winther, D. (2014). A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: Towards a model of compensatory internet use. Development, 47(2), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12839
Kompasiana.com. (2024, June 13). Fenomena “phubbing”: Ngajak Kumpul Bareng Ujung-ujungnya Malah main HP Sendiri. KOMPASIANA. https://www.kompasiana.com/rani32453/666a8d7eed641556690e48a2/fenomena-phubbing-ngajak-kumpul-bareng-ujung-ujungnya-malah-main-hp-sendiri
Liu, K., Chen, W., & Lei, L. (2021). Linking parental phubbing to adolescent self-depreciation: The roles of internal attribution and relationship satisfaction. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 41(8), 1269–1283. https://doi.org/10.1177/027243162198982
Lyubomirsky, S., Sousa, L., & Dickerhoof, R. (2006). The costs and benefits of writing, talking, and thinking about life’s triumphs and defeats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 692–708. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.692
McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). Technoference: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85–98.
Pancani, L., Gerosa, T., Gui, M., & Riva, P. (2020). “Mom, dad, look at me”: The development of the parental phubbing scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(2), 435–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520964866
Piermattei, C., Pace, C. S., Tambelli, R., D’Onofrio, E., & Di Folco, S. (2017). Late adoptions: Attachment security and emotional availability in mother–child and father–child dyads. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(8), 2114–2125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0732-6
Rainie, L. (2015, August 26). Americans’ views on mobile etiquette. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/08/26/americans-views-on-mobile-etiquette/
Rees, G., Savahl, S., Lee, B. J., & Casas, F. (eds.), (2020). Children’s views on their lives and well-being in 35 countries: A report on the Children’s Worlds project, 2016-19. Jerusalem, Israel: Children’s Worlds Project (ISCWeB). https://isciweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Childrens-Worlds-Comparative-Report-2020.pdf
Reni Savitri, 182050353. (2022, November 3). Fenomena phubbing (phone-snubbing) Di Kalangan Mahasiswa kota Bandung. repo unpas. http://repository.unpas.ac.id/60622/
Ramadhani, A. F., & Mubarak, A. (2023). Studi Kontribusi Perceived Organizational Support terhadap Employee Well-Being. Jurnal Riset Psikologi, 3(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrp.v3i2.2766
Navarro, D., Montserrat, C., Malo, S., González, M., Casas, F., & Crous, G. (2015). Subjective well‐being: What do adolescents say? Child & Family Social Work, 22(1), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12215
