Pengaruh Work-Life Balance terhadap Psychological Wellbeing
Abstract
Abstract. Factory employees often face their own difficulties in achieving a balance between the demands of work and personal life, which can have a significant impact on their psychological well-being. The purpose of this study is to see how high work-life balance and psychological wellbeing are, as well as to see the effect of work-life balance on psychological wellbeing. The research uses quantitative methods that are non-experimental causality, analysis using simple linear regression. The population in this study were employees of Production Plant 1A and 1B PT Pupuk Kujang, with stratified random sampling technique obtained 68 samples. The measuring instrument used in this study is the work-life balance scale from Fisher (2002) which has been adapted by Gunawan et al., (2019) and the psychological wellbeing scale from Ryff (1989), which has been adapted to Indonesian culture and language by Rachmayani & Ramdhani (2014). The results of the analysis state that there is an effect of work-life balance on psychological wellbeing with a significance value of p=0.000, the effect of work-life balance variables on psychological wellbeing variables is 27% and the regression coefficient result is -1.326 which means the effect is opposite. In addition, the results of the analysis also stated that 50% of respondents had high work-life balance and 51% of respondents had low psychological wellbeing.
Abstrak. Karyawan pabrik sering menghadapi kesulitan tersendiri dalam mencapai keseimbangan antara tuntutan pekerjaan dan kehidupan pribadi, yang dapat berdampak signifikan pada kesejahteraan psikologis mereka. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat seberapa tinggi work-life balance dan psychological wellbeing, juga melihat pengaruh work-life balance terhadap psychological wellbeing. Penelitian menggunakan metode kuantitatif yang bersifat kausalitas non experimental, analisis menggunakan regresi linear sederhana. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah karyawan Pabrik Produksi 1A dan 1B PT Pupuk Kujang, dengan teknik pengambilan sampel stratified random sampling diperoleh 68 sampel. Alat ukur yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah skala work-life balance dari Fisher (2002) yang sudah diadaptasi oleh Gunawan et al., (2019) dan skala psychological wellbeing dari Ryff (1989), yang sudah diadaptasi ke budaya dan bahasa Indonesia oleh Rachmayani & Ramdhani (2014). Hasil dari analisis menyatakan bahwa terdapat pengaruh work-life balance terhadap psychological wellbeing dengan nilai signifikansi p=0.000, pengaruh variabel work-life balance terhadap variabel psychological wellbeing sebesar 27% dan hasil koefisien regresi sebesar -1,326 yang berarti pengaruhnya berlawanan. Selain itu, hasil analisis juga menyatakan bahwa 50% responden memiliki work-life balance tinggi dan 51% responden memiliki psychological wellbeing rendah.
References
Fisher, G. G., Bulger, C. A., & Smith, C. S. (2009). Beyond Work and Family: A Measure of Work/Nonwork Interference and Enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 2009, Vol. 14, No. 4, 441–45. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0016737
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
Ganapathi, I. M. D. (2016). Pengaruh work-life balance terhadap kepuasan kerja karyawan (studi pada PT. Bio Farma Persero). Jurnal Ecodemica: Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen dan Bisnis, 4(1), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.31294/jeco.v4i1.354
Gunawan, G. (2019). Reliabilitas dan validitas konstruk work life balance di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengukuran Psikologi: JPPP, 8(2), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPPP.082.05
Judge, T. A. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in organizational behavior, 19, 151-188.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2003). Well-being in the workplace and its relationship to business outcomes: A review of the Gallup studies. In C. L. M. Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 205–224). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10594-009
Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A. J., Ferris, M., & Weitzman, M. (2001). Finding an extra day a week: The positive influence of perceived job flexibility on work and family life balance. Family Relations, 50(1), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00049.x
Kapoor, V., Yadav, J., Bajpai, L., & Srivastava, S. (2021). Perceived stress and psychological well-being of working mothers during COVID-19: A mediated moderated roles of teleworking and resilience. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 43(6), 1290-1309. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-05-2020-0244
Kluczyk, M. (2013). The impact of work-life balance on the wellbeing of employees in the private sector in Ireland (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin, National College of Ireland).
Lee, B. J., Lamichhane, D. K., Jung, D. Y., Moon, S. H., Kim, S. J., & Kim, H. C. (2016). Psychosocial factors and psychological well-being: a study from a nationally representative sample of Korean workers. Industrial health, 54(3), 237-245. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2015-0191
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (2023). KADIN dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia. Dilansir 18 Desember 2023, dari https://www.ojk.go.id/ojk-institute/id/news/read/1106/kadin-dalam-peningkatan-kualitas-sumber-daya-manusia-indonesia
Priya, J., Machani, P., Agyei, I. T., Suryanarayana, N. V. S., Thandayuthapani, S., & Lourens, M. (2023). Effects of performance and target pressure on the psychological well-being of corporate employees. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 6(8s), 218-227. https://jrtdd.com/index.php/journal/article/view/876
Punnett, L., & Wegman, D. H. (2004). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 14(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.015
Rachmayani, D., & Ramadhani, N. (2014). Adaptasi bahasa dan budaya skala psychological well-being. http://hdl.handle.net/11617/6417
Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological Well-Being in Adult Life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(4), 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772395
Ryff, C. D., Boylan, J. M., & Kirsch, J. A. (2021). Eudaimonic and hedonic well-being. Measuring well-being, 92-135.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (6), 1069-1081. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,69(4) , 719-727. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (2002). From social structure to biology: Integrative science in pursuit of human health and well-being. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 541-554). New York, NY: Oxford University.
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2006). Knowthyself and become what you are : A Eudaemonic approach to Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9 , 13-39.
Saraji, G Nasl & Dargahi, H. (2006). Study of quality of work life (QWL). Iranian Journal Public Health, 35 (4), 8-14.
Törnquist Agosti, M., Bringsén, Å., & Andersson, I. (2017). The complexity of resources related to work-life balance and well-being–a survey among municipality employees in Sweden. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(16), 2351-2374. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1340323
