The Role and Challenges of Faculty in Reproductive Health Promotion: A Conceptual Paper of Interventions Addressing Student Sexual Risk Behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsms.v5i3.21662Keywords:
Risky sexual behavior, socio-ecological model, universityAbstract
Abstract. University students in emerging adulthood face heightened vulnerability to risky sexual behaviours due to increasing independence, social exploration, and ongoing negotiation of norms. Prevailing campus approaches—passive clinical services and generic health promotion—are insufficient to address multi-level determinants and the persistent knowledge-to-action gap. The objectives of this concept paper is to delineate the roles and challenges of faculties in advancing students’ sexual and reproductive health within Indonesia’s religious-cultural context, and to propose a socio-ecologically grounded framework for a safe, inclusive, and rights-based campus. Conceptual synthesis drawing on the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM), in loco parentis/duty of care, and Indonesian higher-education/communal norms. Evidence and policies were mapped across five levels (individual, relational, organizational, community, policy) to specify mediating mechanisms and moderating conditions, and to derive a multilayered intervention agenda. Key mediators include confidentiality, trust, a non-stigmatizing organizational climate, and policy–curriculum–service coherence. Moderators comprise generation gaps, moral construction/moral panic, staff capacity, and privacy–autonomy concerns. The framework specifies integrated, multilayered actions: skills-based comprehensive sexuality education (CSE); confidential, youth-friendly counseling; peer support; sexual-violence prevention and referral SOP’s; staff training; and strategic collaboration with community services and leaders. Faculties can operationalize a Healthy University model by aligning governance, curricula, and services to cultivate a safe, inclusive, rights-based ecosystem for SRH. A staged empirical agenda—qualitative, participatory, comparative, and longitudinal evaluative studies—is proposed to test, refine, and scale the framework in Indonesian universities.
References
2. Guttmacher Institute. Unintended Pregnancy and Abortion Worldwide. Vol. 47. 2022.
3. Kementrian Kesehatan RI. Survei Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2017. 2018;
4. Noer KU, Kusmawati A, Nurfadhilah. Do not ask, do not tell: The dark path of sexual and reproductive health education in Indonesia. Multidisciplinary Science Journal. 2024;7(6):2025311.
5. Organization WH. Global Accelerated Action for the Health of Adolescents (AA-HA!) - First edition [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2017. 255 p. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/255415/9789241512343-eng.pdf?sequence=1
6. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), UN Women, World Health Organization (WHO). International technical guidance on sexuality education. https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/ITGSE.pdf . 2018.
7. Baigry MI, Ray R, Lindsay D, Kelly-Hanku A, Redman-MacLaren M. Barriers and enablers to young people accessing sexual and reproductive health services in Pacific Island Countries and Territories: A scoping review. PLoS One [Internet]. 2023;18(1 January):1DUMNMY. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280667
8. Sari P, Bestari AD, Martini N, Nirmala SA, Yasirulhaq YY, Hartiti W, et al. An Interactive Learning to Increase the Knowledge of Sexual and Reproductive Health Among University Students: A Pilot Study in West Java, Indonesia. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025;18(December 2024):2721–30.
9. Menteri Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset dan Teknologi Republik Indeonesia. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, Riset Dan Teknologi Ri No. 30 Tahun 2021 Tentang Pencegahan Dan Penanganan Kekerasan Seksual Di Lingkungan Perguruan Tinggi. 2023 p. 307–14.
10. Pakpahan C, Amanda B, Sumino R, Azlansyah A, Simatupang CM, Putri LH, et al. Navigating adolescence matters in Indonesia: insights and needs of students in Islamic schools. Pan African Medical Journal . 2025;50.
11. Wulandari R, Aprianti A, Ashari A, Waluyo DE. Exploring patterns and determinants of premarital sexual behaviour among Indonesian university students. Afr J Reprod Health. 2024;28(6):75–84.
12. Giriani NP, Hapsarani D. A Discourse on Sexuality and Power in Two Indonesian Contemporary Movies. Proceedings of the International University Symposium on Humanities and Arts 2020 (INUSHARTS 2020) [Internet]. 2021;593(Inusharts 2020):194–9. Available from: https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/inusharts-20/125962572
13. Santelli JS, Kantor LM, Grilo SA, Speizer IS, Lindberg LD, Heitel J, et al. Abstinence-only-until-marriage: an update review of US policies and programs and their impact. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2017;61(3):273–80.
14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexual Risk Behaviors. 2022. p. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/sexualbehaviors/i.
15. Jing Z, Li J, Wang Y, Zhou C. Prevalence and trends in sexual behaviors among young adolescents aged 12-15 years in low-income and middle-income countries: a population based study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023;9.
16. Li X, Zhang H, Zhao S, Tang K. Predicting Risky Sexual Behavior Among College Students Through Machine Learning Approaches: Cross-sectional Analysis of Individual Data From 1264 Universities in 31 Provinces in China. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023;9.
17. Wagle A, Karki KB. Prevalence of risky sexual behaviour and its associated factors among youths of Pokhara metropolitan city, Nepal: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Public Health. 2024;2(2):e000945.
18. Ashari A, Widjanarko B, Shaluhiyah Z, Margawati A. Exploring sociodemographic determinants: an investigation into sexual behavior among adolescent in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Health and Behavior [Internet]. 2025; Available from: http://www.shbonweb.com/text.asp?2020/3/1/1/280554
19. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Visnwanath K. Health behavior: theory, research, and practice. 2015.
20. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(4):351–77.
21. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press; 1979.
22. Bronfenbrenner U. Ecological Models of Human Development. In: International Encyclopedia of Education. 1993. p. 37–43.
23. Neel M, Ennis L. The Student, Technology and in Loco Parentis Legal Challenges in the Digital Age [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://techandsoc.com/,
24. World Health Organization. Global strategy for the prevention and control of sexuality transmitted infections: 2006-2015. p. https://who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rt.