Pengaruh Fraud Diamond terhadap Tindakan Kecurangan Mahasiswa
Abstract
Abstract. This study aims to analyze the influence of Fraud Diamond elements on academic misconduct among students at accredited Islamic private universities in Bandung. The Fraud Diamond framework, consisting of pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and capability, is used to understand the factors driving academic dishonesty. A quantitative approach with descriptive and verification methods was applied in this study, involving 100 students selected using a simple random sampling technique. Data were collected through a closed-ended Likert scale questionnaire and analyzed using Smart PLS 3.0 software. The findings indicate that pressure, such as high parental expectations and fear of failure, along with opportunities arising from weak academic supervision, are the primary drivers of academic dishonesty. Additionally, rationalization and capability, such as technical skills in utilizing technology for cheating, reinforce such behavior. The study concludes that the elements of the Fraud Diamond interact in influencing academic misconduct. Recommendations include strengthening supervision systems, integrating integrity education, and providing emotional support for students.
Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh elemen-elemen Fraud Diamond terhadap tindakan kecurangan akademik mahasiswa di perguruan tinggi swasta Islam terakreditasi unggul di Kota Bandung. Fraud Diamond, yang terdiri dari tekanan, peluang, rasionalisasi, dan kemampuan, digunakan sebagai kerangka teoritis untuk memahami faktor-faktor yang mendorong kecurangan. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode deskriptif dan verifikatif diterapkan dalam penelitian ini, melibatkan 100 mahasiswa sebagai responden yang dipilih menggunakan teknik simple random sampling. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner tertutup berbasis skala Likert dan dianalisis menggunakan perangkat lunak Smart PLS 3.0.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tekanan, seperti ekspektasi tinggi orang tua dan rasa takut gagal, serta peluang akibat lemahnya pengawasan akademik, menjadi faktor utama yang mendorong mahasiswa untuk berbuat curang. Selain itu, rasionalisasi dan kemampuan, seperti keterampilan teknis dalam memanfaatkan teknologi untuk kecurangan, memperkuat perilaku tersebut. Kesimpulannya, elemen-elemen Fraud Diamond saling berinteraksi dalam memengaruhi tindakan kecurangan akademik. Rekomendasi penelitian mencakup penguatan sistem pengawasan, pendidikan nilai integritas, dan dukungan emosional bagi mahasiswa.
References
Albrecht, W. S. (2020). Fraud examination.
Andriani, Y., & Kusuma, P. (2021). Applying the Fraud Diamond Theory in academic settings: A case study on academic dishonesty among university students.
Darmayanti, N., Rosyida, I. A., & Irawan, G. A. (2020). Pengaruh dimensi Fraud Diamond terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa jurusan akuntansi. Universitas Prasetiya Mulya.
Dewi, N. L. P., & Sudana, I. W. (2021). Pengaruh lingkungan akademik terhadap kecurangan akademik mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran.
Dewi AS, Nurleli. Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran dan Akuntansi Pertanggungjawaban terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi. 2021 Dec 23;1(2):86–91.
Fadilah, S., Maemunah, M., Nurrahmawati, Lim, T. N., & Sundary, R. I. (2019). Forensic accounting: Fraud detection skills for external auditors. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.20.1.15
Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Ghozali, Imam dan Hengky Latan (2015). Partial Least Squares Konsep Teknik dan Aplikasi dengan Program Smart PLS 3.0. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.
Gallant, T. B. (2021). Academic integrity in the 21st century: A teaching and learning imperative.
Gray, I., & Manson, S. (2019). Corporate fraud handbook: Prevention and detection.
Gray, I., & Manson, S. (2022). Forensic and investigative accounting.
Hopwood, W. S., Leiner, J. J., & Young, G. R. (2019). A survey of fraud examination and investigation. Wiley.
Jogiyanto. (2011). Partial Least Square (PLS), Alternatif Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) dalam Penelitian Bisnis.
Marshall, B. (2022). Academic dishonesty: An educator's guide.
McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2019). Cheating academic integrity: Lessons learned from 30 years of research.
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). Fraud Diamond Theory.
Hopwood, W., Leiner, J., & Young, G. (2019). Forensic accounting and fraud examination.
Lichtenberg, T. A., & Johnson, S. R. (2017). Academic dishonesty: An educator's guide.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. john wiley & sons.
